The Borough Market Twelve Meet for talks on Professional Associations
On Friday 3 July twelve librarians, information professionals – call us what you will - enjoyed a breakfast at Roast in Borough Market as part of the Sue Hill Recruitment breakfast programme. The hot topic of the morning was ‘ Professional Bodies - Do we need them?’ The short answer was that the group were passionate about the information work they do and yes having a professional body where we can all ‘hang our hats’ really does give kudos to the profession. However the issue is what should the professional body look like and offer its members. It is quite clear that there is a multiplicity of choices from BIALL, SLA, Sconul, SCIP, National Council of Archives, RMS and of course CILIP and its groups, too much choice can cause confusion to those outside the profession looking in. Why did they all evolve? A disenchantment with other professional associations?
The debate was extremely lively and for once I found it hard to get a word in as the conversation flowed and in what seemed like a blink of an eye it was nearly 9.30am and time to head off for our respective work places. In discussing success stories and best practice in growing membership, it was clear that having an outward facing strategy with strong CPD aspects is key and an organisation should not exist for the benefit of its officers and employees alone. The membership should be driving through their needs and expectations of a professional body and have a true voice that is heard. Examples of strong leadership and success were discussed and common denominators appear to be ‘ passion’, ‘energy’, 'speed of response' and good succession planning. The group agreed that CPD, networking, having a best practice body of knowledge and advocacy are core benefits of a professional group. However the issue of professional certification was discussed and the group concluded that ‘qualifications do not make you professional’ and that it could be argued that ‘hiding’ behind professional certification is no benchmark for how professional or relevant to a post an individual maybe. It can certainly assure a level of competence but it is the body of work that drives through professionalism, values, competencies and skills. What next then for professional groups? How to make the right choice? In this economic climate members may vote with their purse.
From the lively debate it is clear that there needs to be significant change in how professional bodies are structured, managed and financed to serve (a key word to use and is often forgotten) its members. One can look to the US and SLA for examples of how strong and charismatic leadership is driving forward, with a passion, its offering, relevance and CPD in abundance and value for money. It is not yet the tolling of the death bell for professional bodies but it is quite clear that there needs to be significant change and quickly before ‘others’ prey on the disillusioned and ‘lost’ librarians. A call to arms!
- Sue Edgar